**1.0 The Periodic Navier-Stokes Matrix Differential Equation**

Begin with the Navier-Stokes equation [1] describing the time evolution of an incompressible flow’s Fourier modes

(1)

where and are discrete wavenumbers with for some even integer and where . Included in (1) are , a known viscosity , the incompressibility condition , the projection tensor

, (2)

and

. (3)

Simultaneously consider all wavenumbers by writing (1) in consecutive trios of rows for . This forms the periodic Navier-Stokes matrix differential equation

(4)

where

(5)

and

, (6)

with

, (7)

, (8)

(9)

and

. (10)

**2.0 Power Series Solution**

Expand as a time series

(11)

with unknown coefficients and more simply . Substituting (11) into (1) and performing the time differentiation gives

(12)

with

. (13)

Matching coefficients in (12) when gives a recursion formula for the unknown flow coefficients

. (14)

It begins with a known initial flow with an assumed magnitude of unity. As equations (11) and (14) describe the continuous time series solution to the periodic Navier-Stokes equation.

**3.0 The Recursion Formula**

Reducing the dimensionality of the quantities in (14) to a scalar, beginning with and ignoring the wavenumber factors quickly reveals that this recursion formula creates coefficients geometric in nature , and therefore time series coefficients admitting only a finite time interval of convergence. Extensive numerical simulations evaluating for increasing values of , using (14) and mostly white-noise water flows with a paltry and without the no-slip boundaries, corroborate this universally-predicted, power-law blow-up behavior. This is far from a proof though.

**4.0 The Immortal Matrix Exponential Solution**

There is a way out of this apparent hopelessness. It involves restricting attention to directionally stationary flows, i.e., flows that in wavenumber space are constant in direction but varying in magnitude over time. It keys off the observation that a flow’s pressure gradient is always parallel to wavenumber (see [1] for example) and therefore is directionally stationary. This restriction, however, does not force directional stationarity in physical space.

As a means of its mathematical introduction, notice that back substituting in (14) for and keeping just the first term involving etc., yields

, (15)

which when the time variable is added, represents the series expansion of . This is stable for non-positive real eigenvalues which is certainly the case for viscous and turns out to be the case for all convective . The convective eigenvalues are purely imaginary (or zero) and come in conjugate pairs. Its eigenvectors form a unitary basis. Neither are proven here.

The viscous part of (15) is well understood, but the convective part is not, and, along with (4) suggests the universally convergent matrix exponential solution [2]

. (16)

It arises when commute. If

(17)

is the eigendecomposition of , commutativity requires that eigenvectors are time-order independent

. (18)

In view of (3) and (10) one way of achieving (18) is to require self-similar

, (19)

for scalar . These are directionally stationary flows, flows that can vary wildly in magnitude and direction from wavenumber to wavenumber but are constant in direction at each wavenumber. Directional stationarity in wavenumber does NOT imply directional stationarity in physical space.

Constraint (19) requires that the projection matrix project flow vectors parallel to initial flow rather than just onto the plane perpendicular to wavenumber. This can be achieved by

(20)

rather than (14). Most importantly, (20) maintains incompressibility because the initial flow by assumption is incompressible.

**Remarks**

The above sections describe a purely mathematical invention and construction of a regular solution to the periodic Navier-Stokes equation (1), and, as such, should stand on its own merit. Is it universal? No. In wavenumber space it requires that flows remain directionally stationary as does pressure gradient. While this does not force directional stationarity in physical space, and, therefore permits flows that can vary in magnitude and direction, it remains just a curiosity.

**References**

[1] Pope SB 2003 *Turbulent Flows* eq 6.146 Cambridge University Press NY NY [2] arxiv.org/abs/math/0610086

]]>